Venue: Council Chamber, Civic Centre, Windmill Street, Gravesend DA12 1AU. View directions
Contact: Committee Section
Email: committee.section@gravesham.gov.uk
Items
No. |
Item |
1. |
Apologies
Minutes:
Apologies for absence were received from Cllr
Conrad Broadley (KCC), Cllr Alan Ridgers (KCC) and Cllr Jordan
Meade (KCC).
|
2. |
To sign the minutes of the previous meeting PDF 228 KB
Minutes:
The minutes of the Gravesham Joint
Transportation Board held on Wednesday, 06 March 2024 were agreed
and signed by the Chair.
|
3. |
To declare any interests members may have in the items contained on this agenda. When declaring an interest members should state what their interest is.
Minutes:
No declarations of interest were made.
|
4. |
Matters Arising from Previous Meetings PDF 212 KB
Minutes:
Members were content with the responses
provided by officers. The Highways Manager (Dartford &
Gravesham) advised that he had gone over the historical information
relating to JTB and had spoken to colleagues, but that there was
nothing to note regarding the matters arising.
The board noted the matters.
|
5. |
Reports from Officers
|
5a |
Highways Forward Works Programme: 2023/24 PDF 317 KB
Minutes:
The Highways Manager (Dartford & Gravesham)
introduced the board to the highways forward works programme
2023/24 and advised that it was an information only
document.
Following questions and comments from members, the
Highways Manager (Dartford & Gravesham) explained
that:
-
The micro surfacing is a surface treatment only that
should protect the road for approximately another 10 years or so.
The lining renewal was due to be applied 1-3 days after the new
road surface had bedded, but the weather had prevented the team
from doing so. Members were advised this would be taking place
within the next week.
-
The streetlights that had been cut to make safe
(necked) will be batched by the partner contractor and would be
programmed for replacement. They would also look at the viability
of the streetlight. For example, if it was a common crash site, it
may not be worth the replacement in terms of a reoccurring
financial cost.
-
Damaged railings, and any other street furniture,
would be programmed for replacement within 28 days of notification
generally, but will be prioritised as per the well managed highways
code of practice based on risk assessments.
The board noted the report.
|
5b |
Petition - Safety Improvements to Reduce Driver speeds and enhance crossing facilities at the Shorne Crossroads PDF 1 MB
Additional documents:
Minutes:
The West Kent Highway Improvements Programme Manager
introduced members of the board to a report in response to a
petition received, and explained the following:
-
The report detailed information following the
receipt of the petition, which had gained over 1,200 signatures.
The petition requested safety improvements at A226 Shorne
crossroads junction with Green Farm Lane and Forge
Lane.
-
A lot of work had taken place prior in this
area.
-
Limited warning signs were already in place, but KCC
highway improvements team were in the process of having yellow
warning signs installed along with other signing and lining
advising drivers to reduce their speed on approach to Shorne
crossroads. The works for the new signage had been ordered and
should be with KCC by October 2024.
-
KCC had also been looking at other
options.
-
The West Kent Highway Improvements Programme Manager
advised that the petition made reference to signalised crossing,
but this was far more substantial than what they could do without a
funding bid. Members were advised that instead of waiting for
funding, they had commissioned a consultant to prepare a plan so
that if they did receive funding, the scheme would be ready to go.
In the interim, they were improving signage and were carrying out
speed surveys and data analysis.
Following questions and comments from members, the
West Kent Highway Improvements Programme Manager explained
that:
-
He was aware of two site visits that had taken
place, including a meeting with Parish Councillors over teams to
discuss the site. Members were advised that when a fatality occurs
on the public highway, the highway improvements team and highway
operations team were notified and must carry out a Safety
Engineering Report within two weeks of receiving notification from
Kent Police– this requires a site visit.
-
Parish Councillors expressed their frustration at
not being included within the site visits but were advised that
they were unable to come along to the Safety Engineering site
visits due to it needing to be carried out with officers. However,
he explained that Michelle Norris would be happy to conduct a site
visit with Parish Councillors.
-
The Chair noted that members of the public had
expressed their concerns within the petition.
-
The West Kent Highway Improvements Programme Manager
was asked to update the board regarding data on dangerous driving
within the Borough. He advised that KCC received their injury
related crash data from Kent Police, and it takes 4 to 6 months for
the data to be issued to KCC. This includes information on any
substance abuse resulting in an incident. Members raised particular
areas of concern for that data to come back to the next meeting.
The West Kent Highway Improvements Programme Manager advised that
this would be a substantial project to review crash data for the
whole borough so wouldn’t be able to commit to this but will
carry out an exercise to review crash trends at Shorne crossroads
to ascertain if there has been an increase in crashes in this
location involving driver ...
view the full minutes text for item 5b
|
5c |
THE GRAVESHAM BOROUGH COUNCIL (OFF-STREET PARKING PLACES) (VARIATION NO.5) ORDER 2024 PDF 457 KB
Minutes:
The Parking &
Highway Officer introduced members of the board to the report and
advised the following:
- The building safety
team had received feedback from Kent Fire and Rescue, advising that
how individuals were parking around the building was deemed unsafe.
They initially placed additional signage, but this did not improve
the situation.
- Alternatively, they
needed to look at an enforcement option, but this did not involve
any changes or permits. It just means that they can enforce action
on those who are parking where they shouldn’t be such as in
restricted areas and outside of bay markings etc.
- They had written to all
residents ahead of the consultation with an explanation that had
been drafted in conjunction with GBC’s Housing and Building
Safety teams, referencing the concerns raised by Kent Fire and
Rescue.
- The Parking & Highway Officer was informed that residents had
welcomed the guidance and it had been well received.
The board noted the report.
|
6. |
Issues raised by Councillors with the approval of the Chair
Minutes:
a)
Double Parking and Parking at Dropped
Footways
Cllr D Croxton advised this could be brought to the
next meeting of JTB but queried whether GBC issued fines for
individuals who parked behind dropped kerbs and consequently
restricted access for people with disabilities.
The
Parking & Highway Officer advised that they do enforce this
regularly, but that if there were any places in particular where
this was a regular occurrence, to let the team know and this could
be passed on to the enforcement officers.
Cllr Lauren Sullivan asked if any communications could be put
out in regards to this. The Parking & Highways Officer agreed
to discuss with Nicholas May (Parking & Environmental
Enforcement Services Manage) on their return from annual
leave.
b)
Meopham Parade
Cllr
Sweetland (KCC) asked for a follow-up on the current status of
Meopham Parade in terms of timescales. He raised concerns about the
narrowing on the roads and the impact this could have on the shops
who regularly receive deliveries.
The West
Kent Highway Improvements Programme Manager advised that they were
in the process of a safety audit for the plans, but they were ready
to be shared with Cllr Sweetland (KCC) and the parishes. As long as
they could get the road space and correct time restrictions, they
were hoping this could be implemented in autumn. Michelle Norris
had picked up on the loading restrictions and were looking at
alternatives but would keep Cllr Sweetland (KCC) and shop owners
involved in discussions.
|