Venue: Council Chamber, Civic Centre, Windmill Street, Gravesend DA12 1AU. View directions
Contact: Committee Section
Items
No. |
Item |
1. |
Apologies for Absence
Minutes:
An apology for absence was
received from Cllr Adewale King and Cllr Williams attended as his
substitute.
|
2. |
Minutes PDF 148 KB
Minutes:
The minutes of the meeting held
on Wednesday, 22 March 2023 were signed by the Chair.
|
3. |
Declarations of Interest
Minutes:
There were no declarations of
interest.
|
4. |
Presentation on Gravesend and Northfleet Cemeteries PDF 7 MB
Minutes:
Members were provided with a
presentation on Gravesend and Northfleet Cemeteries. The presentation can be viewed via the following
link:
democracy.gravesham.gov.uk/documents/b17420/Supplementary
Document - Presentation on Gravesend Northfleet Cemeteries Thursday
14-Sep-2023 19.pdf?T=9
During the presentation
the Cemeteries and Allotments Manager highlighted
that:
- Gravesend Cemetery
had been established as a cemetery in1878 and designed by the
architect Stephen Geary who designed Highgate Cemetery in
London. Originally a pleasure garden,
the front property, chapels and walls of Gravesend Cemetery were
grade 2 listed.
- Members were informed
of the Forget You Not Garden which is being created through
rewilding at Gravesend Cemetery. The
concept was to offer a calm space for bereaved visitors to reflect
and also incorporate wildlife preservation. The garden will include benches inscribed with
mindful quotes and a special post box.
The Committee were informed that bereaved friends/family could send
a letter by using the seed infused paper within the envelope to
those they had lost. Loved ones would
be sent an envelope, which contained a small piece of biodegradable
paper infused with wildflower seeds. Once returned via the post box, these
envelopes would then be buried in the gardens. As the entire envelope would be 100%
biodegradable, the envelope would be planted in its
entirety.
- Members were informed
that the Forget you Not Garden currently had hedgehogs and the team
were working with an organisation on the prospect of becoming a
hedgehog release area.
- The Committee were
updated that new passing bays had been introduced along the roads
throughout Northfleet Cemetery to protect the grass, and to also
allow for easy passing for those driving in the
cemetery.
- New benches were
being introduced at both cemeteries. The new benches were produced
by sustainably sourced teak, guaranteed for 25 years and would not
require further treatment. The benches
could be purchased by loved ones and be engraved.
- The Committee were
informed that there were some disused roads within Northfleet
Cemetery that would be sewn with grass seed and when required the
area could accommodate 30-40 new graves.
The Chair thanked the
Cemeteries and Allotments Manager for her presentation and invited
Members to make comment:
- Members asked if the
biodegradable seed envelopes would be available for both cemeteries
and whether they would also be sent to loved ones of those who had
passed away previously or going forward. The Cemeteries and Allotments
Manager advised that the focus for the initiative was for Gravesend
Cemetery initially, with the newly created garden. It was hoped in the future that there would also
be a suitable area created within Northfleet Cemetery. Members were informed that the bereaved of
those buried at Northfleet, would still receive an envelope, which
they could choose to use at home or be planted on their loved ones
grave at Northfleet cemetery if they wished. There were also plans in place to send envelopes
to those who had lost family during Covid19.
|
5. |
Pre-consultation report on the bi-annual taxi tariff review PDF 240 KB
Additional documents:
Minutes:
The Committee was presented
with the Review of Taxi Tariff. The
purpose of the report was to present Members with the proposed
consultation methodology relating to the previously agreed
two-yearly review of the taxi tariff.
Approval was sought from Committee regarding the proposed
methodology of the consultation approach.
The Assistant Licensing Manager
highlighted key points from the report:
- Members were informed
that as the licensing authority, Gravesham was able to set a tariff
for licensed Hackney Carriages operating
within the borough. Members were advised that the
‘flag’ and the ‘yardage’ fees would be
reviewed every two years. It was agreed in 2019 to alternate separate
consultations of the ‘flag‘ and the
‘yardage’. As the
‘flag’ was last reviewed in September/October
2021, it was now time to consult on the
‘yardage’.
- Gravesham Borough
Council had chosen to set the tariff to represent the maximum that
could be charged.
- Following
collaboration with the Gravesham Taxi Association (GTA), six
options were considered for the ‘yardage’, including
one option proposed by the GTA as set out in section 2.1.6 of the
report, which proposed to increase the tariff
by 40p per mile, by increasing the yardage to 270.76 (2/13 of a
mile) but also increasing the charge per 270.76 yard to
40p.
It
was explained that because the meter clicked over at the beginning
of the yardage, option 2.1.6 would provide a 20p higher fare, than
an equivalent journey on option 2.1.4, for the first 135 yards of
each 270 yards travelled.
- In relation to the
6-mile uplift, the Licensing Assistant Manager explained that there
were two options presented to the GTA.
Option one was to remove the uplift and option two was to keep the
uplift at two nths above from the yardage.
The
GTA’s preference was to keep the increase, so if the
‘yardage’ went to 20p every 135.38 (1/13 of a mile)
then the six-mile uplift would change to 20p every 117.33 yards
(1/15 of a mile). Members were advised
that the GTA wanted to keep the uplift as they would receive a
greater fare for longer journeys such as airport runs.
- The Assistant
Licensing Manager outlined the proposed consultation methodology
explaining that the licensing team wished to consult the Hackney
Carriage drivers over a four week period to establish the preferred
fare options (set out in the report appendix). Members were informed that although usual practice
was to communicate online, the GTA had requested that paper forms
could also be provided, as another method to cast handwritten
responses on this consultation. It had
been agreed with the Customer Services Manager, that a sealed
ballot box could be placed in the reception area of the Civic
Centre for the drivers to post their responses.
The
Chair thanked the Assistant Licensing Manager for her report and
invited Members to give their feedback.
- Members understood
the need for paper responses as well as online, accommodating those
who were not computer literate.
|
6. |
Corporate Register of Partnerships and Shared Working Arrangements - Operational Services Committee PDF 280 KB
Additional documents:
Minutes:
Members were presented with the
Corporate Register of Partnerships – July 2023. The purpose of the report was to inform Members of
the Operational Services Committee of the Council’s
involvement in partnerships that were within the remit of the
Committee.
The Regulatory Services Manager
highlighted key points from the report and Members had their
questions answered:
- Members were informed
that Operational Services had two partnerships and one shared
arrangement. The partnerships were the
Kent & Medway Air Quality Partnership and Kent Resource
Partnership (KRP) Members Board. The
shared arrangement was the Licensing Shared Service between
Gravesham and Medway.
- The Regulatory
Services Manager informed Members that the Kent & Medway Air
Quality partnership was now more of an officer group but
historically a partnership. Although over the years the authority
had moved away from the arrangement, partnership work was still
carried out and therefore this partnership still remained on the
register. The Committee were advised
that the partnership supported the corporate objectives, including
relation to climate change. Members
were informed the referenced annual cost of £5605 +VAT,
related to monitoring of air quality and the impressive website
Kent Air.
The
Committee highlighted that the name of the Lead Member was
incorrectly printed within the appendix, for this particular
partnership. Members were reassured
this would be amended.
Members appreciated the financial cost of this partnership but
expressed that for the sake of public health it was an important
partnership to be part of.
- The Assistant
Director (Operations) informed members of the Kent Resource
Partnership (KRP) Members Board. He
outlined that the partnership considered waste, recycling and fly
tipping and highlighted its great importance, pointing out that
without the partnership there would be a significant cost to the
tax payer. Members were informed that
Gravesham contributed £15K per year towards the partnership
budget, however gained countrywide communication, external funding
and invaluable partnership with intelligence officers. Intelligence officers based within Kent Trading
Standards worked with Local Authority Enforcement Officers to
investigate fly tippers, gathering information with other local
authorities leading to maximum penalties for criminals.
Members queried how Kent was performing in respect of waste and
recycling figures. The Assistant
Director (Operations) noted that as a county, Kent fell just under
50% of waste being recycled. Nationally
the recycling stood at 45%. He went on
to say that Kent had a small amount of landfill which was under
2%. This 2% was made up of mainly
marine animals and asbestos.
- The Regulatory
Service Manager updated Members on the Licensing Shared Service
between Gravesham and Medway which was formed in January
2019. The Committee were informed that
this was a Gravesham led shared service which had gone from
strength to strength, having led the way digitally in terms of
online applications and automation of licenses. In relation to cost implications, Members were
advised that Medway Council paid 75% of all costs with Gravesham
contributing 25%. These figures were
based on staffing and number of licenses issued in each
area. Both authorities kept 100% of
their own income. ...
view the full minutes text for item 6.
|