Lower Thames Crossing
The Chief Executive advised that Highways England commenced its statutory consultation on its proposals for a Lower Thames Crossing on 10 October 2018. The Council needed to submit its comments by the end of 20 December 2018.
The Chief Executive stated that, following attendance at all three Group meetings (Gravesham Independent Conservatives, Labour and Conservative), the Council’s response to the statutory consultation had been revised to incorporate the comments made at those meetings. The revised response had been published on the Council’s website and circulated to Members in advance of the meeting.
Due to the interest in the item and time constraints, the Mayor invited four Members of each Group to speak for up to 5 minutes each.
1. Highways England (HE) be thanked for carrying out the statutory consultation process whilst noting that insufficient time has been allowed to properly digest and respond to it given the volume of material involved.
2. the resolutions of 8 December 2015, opposing in principle a new Lower Thames Crossing (LTC) to the east of Gravesend, be re-affirmed.
3. the Council is of the view that LTC will only provide temporary alleviation of congestion at Dartford and will only defer a requirement to take action at that location.
4. the Council considers the Preliminary Environment Information Report (PEIR) to be deficient in a number of areas and it fails the requirements of the relevant Regulations.
5. the Council considers that further design work, environmental assessment and consultation needs to be carried out on the Thong Lane Bridge north and the tunnel portal to mitigate the impacts of the scheme on local residents through consideration of, amongst other things:
i. Extension of the tunnel southwards whether bored or cut and cover.
ii. Widening of the Thong Lane green bridge to a minimum of 80m.
iii. Mitigation for Riverview Park and Thong residents from the impacts of noise, disturbance and air quality
6. the environmental impact of the new LTC/A2/M2 junction on the A2 corridor is unacceptable and further detailed work is required if an acceptable solution is to be produced, which needs to address, amongst other things:
i. Design speed of the junction slip roads ensuring free flow.
ii. Width of Thong Lane South and Brewers Road green bridges.
iii. Loss of HS1 landscaping and the overall impact on landscape, nature conservation and historic environment, particularly in the Kent Downs Area of Outstanding Natural Beauty.
7. the Council considers that the Gravesend East junction should connect direct to the A2/M2 east-bound and, if possible, Lower Thames Crossing but that it is not in a position to make a definitive judgement in the absence of a proper assessment of alternative junction designs and detailed highway modelling.
8. the Council cannot provide a definitive view on the issue of variable charging, given the lack of information, transport modelling and consequential impacts, but basic principles should be:
i. Same charging regime at both Dartford Crossing and Lower Thames Crossing.
ii. GBC residents receive the same discount as those in Dartford and Thurrock which should apply to both crossings and start from commencement of construction.
iii. No additional charging in the peaks.
iv. A proportion of the revenues collected from tolls should be paid to a Community Fund administered by this Council to undertake leisure and other projects that will benefit the local community.
v. The above and other matters should be examined in detail through a working group.
9. in any event, the Council considers that the transport modelling needs to reflect the requirements of the Infrastructure Planning (Environmental Impact Assessment) Regulations 2017, National Policy Statement for National Networks (2014), and the National Planning Policy Framework (2018), and associated guidance, upon Local Authorities for the delivery of housing.
10. there is considerable concern over the wider impacts on the wider highway network in Kent, in particular on A227, A228, A229 and M2 and well as the potential implications for local roads from the junction arrangements. These are not assessed as part of this consultation and this is a serious omission on the part of Highways England. It is imperative that a full assessment is conducted and that any improvements to the local strategic highway network found necessary are programmed and implemented prior to the opening of the new Crossing. The Council is particularly concerned at the absence of any evaluation of the Bluebell Hill junction on the A229 and considers that the suggestion of vehicles using the A249 as an alternative is completely unrealistic.
11. the information about the construction compounds is unclear and there is considerable concern over the implications for local residents and the environment given the long timescale involved and the activities that may take place.
12. there will be considerable disruption to the lives of residents both during the construction period and when the Crossing is in use and there should be arrangements for adequate financial compensation to those affected.
13. during the construction phase Highways England should require its contractors to use local labour wherever possible, including the creation of apprenticeships to provide a long term legacy of a higher skills base in the area.
14. the contents of this report, the minutes, the appraisal (with appendices) and the responses to the consultation questions (as amended) set out in Appendix 2 be submitted to Highways England (Lower Thames Crossing and Chief Executive Officer), Adam Holloway MP, Minister of State for Transport, with the Director (Housing and Regeneration) being granted delegated authority to make minor amendments.
The Council thanked the officers involved for the hard work which had been undertaken to date.
- 181207 Council Report v3, item 30. PDF 166 KB
- Appendix 2 Consultation Documents, item 30. PDF 92 KB
- Appendix 3 Highways England Questions, item 30. PDF 88 KB
- Appendix 4 Appraisal of Consultation Material, item 30. PDF 1006 KB
- Annex 1 Development boundary, item 30. PDF 3 MB
- Annex 2 Current Lower Thames Crossing Scheme Proposals, item 30. PDF 1 MB
- Annex 3 Housing development quantities, item 30. PDF 154 KB
- Annex 4 Air Qulaity report from Bureau Veritas, item 30. PDF 674 KB
- Annex 5a Heritage issues note, item 30. PDF 172 KB
- Annex 5b KCC Heritage Conservation, item 30. PDF 155 KB
- Annex 5c KCC Heritage Conservation additional, item 30. PDF 118 KB
- Annex 6a Landscape report from Val Hyland Associates, item 30. PDF 201 KB
- Annex 6b Kent Downs AoNB Unit Comments, item 30. PDF 234 KB
- Annex 6c CTRL and LTC cross sections in AoNB, item 30. PDF 5 MB
- Annex 7a Noise & Vibration from Bureau Veritas, item 30. PDF 501 KB
- Annex 7b Noise Maps, item 30. PDF 2 MB
- 181217 Revised Lower Thames Crossing Recommendations, item 30. PDF 51 KB